More :

Contact Us

Send us a message

First Name

Last Name

Title

Email

Phone Number

Country:

Your Company

Industry

Interested in:

Add Message:

Contact details

    • Offices

      GenCell Worldwide HQ
      +972 3 726 1616
      7 HaTnufa Street
      Petach Tikva 4951025
      ISRAEL

       

      GenCell Power Center, Europe
      Anwenderzentrum H2Herten
      Doncaster-Platz 5
      45699 Herten
      GERMANY

       

      Gencell Inc.
      1370 Broadway, 5th Floor
      New York, NY 10018
      USA

To apply for a job at Gencell go to Careers

Choose language

Menu

Is Hydrogen Safe?

Powered by Hydrogen logoIt seems like everyone is talking about hydrogen. Whether it’s about fuel-powered-cars by Toyota and Honda or a new fueling distribution system in California, people often ask whether hydrogen is safe. Even some of our prospects ask about it when they’re looking at our fuel-cell-powered GenCell G5 long-duration UPS or GenCell G5rx utility backup power solution.

Many people are surprised to learn that hydrogen is as safe or even safer than other flammable fuels such as gasoline or methane. For more than 50 years, hydrogen has been safely produced, transported and used in substantial amounts by many industries using established best practices.

So why is hydrogen safer? One of the keys to hydrogen safety—in addition to the best practices for handling it—is that it’s 57 times lighter than gasoline vapor and 14 times lighter than air. This means that in the event of a leak, hydrogen rapidly rises into the atmosphere. How rapidly you may ask? It rises into the air at a speed of 45 mph (20m/s) or 2,100 cubic feet per minute (60,000 l/min).

The net result is that hydrogen dissipates very, very quickly. And if there’s a fire, it burns very quickly rather than pooling and causing an explosion like gasoline.

A 2001 study by the University of Miami confirmed the relative safety of hydrogen over gasoline. In their study, they created fuel leaks in hydrogen-powered and gasoline-powered cars and ignited them. The gasoline-fed car fire consumed the vehicle leaving it a smoldering heap of charred steel and melted glass. In the words of the study:

The damage to the gasoline-powered vehicle was severe. The hydrogen-powered vehicle was undamaged. The maximum surface temperatures measured on the hydrogen-powered vehicle were 117°F on the rear window glass and 67°F at the rear tray (between the rear window and rear seat).

While the original video footage from the experiment is not online, there are some very dramatic images from the footage in the original report. If a picture is worth a thousand words, then these images are worth tens of thousands…and will leave you confident about the safety of hydrogen as a fuel.

Image from the video of the experiment at 0 minutes, 0 seconds. The hydrogen-powered vehicle is on the left and the gasoline-powered vehicle is on the right.

 

Time at 0 min, 3 sec. – Ignition of both fuels occur. Hydrogen flow rate is 2,100 SCFM (standard cubic feet per minute) while the gasoline flow rate is 680 cc/min.

 

Time at 1 min, 0 sec. – The flow of hydrogen is subsiding while the fire of the gasoline
vehicle begins to intensify.

 

Time at 1 min, 30 sec. – The flow of hydrogen has almost finished while the gasoline powered vehicle is engulfed in flames. (View of the gasoline car fire has been expanded to observe details).

 

Time at 2 min, 40 sec. – Deflagration (subsonic explosion) of the interior gasoline-powered vehicle begins as flames emerge from the trunk and the driver’s side rear tire ruptures, sending debris out the passenger side of the vehicle. (The hydrogen vehicle is no longer burning.)

 

Stay Connected